![]() Subscribe for your weekly spark of inspiration. P.S. do you like this article? This article was featured in our newsletter: Signals. Oh and by the way, if you want to find out how you’re scoring on the psychological richness scale, you can take the test here. We will keep you up to date on any significant changes. Whether that is the case will depend on further research.Īt TrendsActive we are always closely monitoring developments in the discussion of what a good life entails. A possible explanation could be that some key elements of a happy life, for example comfort and security, are seemingly so ingrained in Western societies, that people long for things they perceive to be missing, like meaning or richness. Some of the most developed and relatively stable countries (Germany, Norway, Portugal) score the lowest preference for a happy life in the survey. Both as a way of validating their own lives and as a result of selection (people that prefer a happy life are more likely to seek out a happy life).Įspecially the second explanation is interesting from a Western point of view. The third explanation is rather the opposite, an approach of self-justification people desire what they already have. Let’s say, somebody living in unstable economic and political conditions might seek stability and a happy life, whereas somebody living in safe and stable conditions might lack a sense of adventure and rather prefer a psychologically rich life etc. A next explanation regards the so called compensatory approach, where people desire what they lack. The other two explanations take into account the life people are already living. ![]() Firstly, this could be based on individual differences and values personal dispositions and values guide different kinds of people to desire different kinds of lives. The authors raise three possible explanations as of why people desire different types of lives. Abstract: Classical theories of hedonic adaptation assume that lasting changes in subjective. As demonstrated in the questionnaire, most people choose a happy life, yet there are plenty of people that rather prefer a different kind of life. There does not appear to be one typical life that is considered ‘the best’ for everyone. Even though the idea of psychological richness is related to a happy and meaningful life, it was tested and confirmed as a third distinct dimension of a good life. The facilitators of such a psychologically rich life are hypothesised by the authors to be curiosity, spontaneity and energy. The article describes psychological richness as a life defined by variety, interestingness and perspective change. However, in a study published in the journal of the American Psychological Association this year, a new dimension was added to the discussion: psychological richness. Simply put, happiness is defined by pleasure, comfort and stability (hedonic), while meaning is defined by purpose, significance and coherence (eudaimonic). ![]() For the longest time science focused on two dimensions happiness and meaning. Since we advise brands on how to impact people, it only makes sense for us to closely follow what it is that defines well-being for people. For example, if the price of a house is determined by different characteristics, like the number of bedrooms, the number of bathrooms, proximity to schools, etc., regression analysis can be used to determine the relative importance of each variable.At TrendsActive we are very invested in the debate of what exactly makes for a good life. Hedonic pricing is a revealed-preference method used in economics and consumer science to determine the relative importance of the variables which affect the price of or demand for a good or service. Hedonic regression is used in hedonic pricing models and is commonly applied in real estate, retail, and economics. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |